Press Releases & News
American Solar Manufacturers Urge Government Not to Crush Manufacturing Jobs with Tariffs
August 17, 2017 | Boulder, CO
Ecolibrium Solar has joined forces with PanelClaw and 26 other American solar manufacturers to urge the U.S. International Trade Commission to oppose the tariff on imported solar parts that has been requested by Suniva.
It is our conviction that such a tariff would seriously impede the growth of solar energy in the U.S. and result in the loss of thousands of manufacturing and installation jobs nationwide.
The press release follows.
North Andover, Massachusetts – August 22 – Today, American solar manufacturer PanelClaw and 26 other American manufacturers sent an open letter to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) urging the agency to oppose tariffs that would endanger American manufacturing jobs and U.S. competitiveness. The letter follows the ITC’s first public hearing on the petition on Aug. 15, where hundreds of solar workers, elected officials, and U.S. trading partners showed up in force to oppose Suniva’s request for tariffs on imported solar parts.
“The tariffs requested by Suniva would more than double the price of solar panels in the U.S., undercutting the cost-competitiveness of solar and reversing its high growth trajectory. We would be forced to cut our manufacturing, seriously endangering manufacturing jobs at our factories,” said the letter to the ITC. “We have been building our companies to meet demand from a large and growing domestic solar market. That market is now under threat. We are true U.S. solar manufacturers and we ask that you not grant Suniva’s request for global safeguards.”
Suniva, a bankrupt Chinese-owned solar company, and German-owned SolarWorld, also in bankruptcy, are attempting to convince the ITC that even though requested tariffs will double the cost of solar in America, solar manufacturing will grow – which defies the laws of economics. PanelClaw and American manufacturers from across the country are standing together to say this is irrefutably false.
“PanelClaw is a 10-year-old U.S. company with over 30 percent market share of all flat roof racking in the U.S.,” said Constantino Nicolaou, CEO of PanelClaw. “We are proud of our US heritage and have invested in innovation, manufacturing, and much more.
“The notion by the petitioners that increasing the cost of modules will lead to job creation is not only unconscionable, but also counter to all we have seen since the industry was born,” Nicolaou continued. “We urge the commission to reject this petition.”
Suniva and SolarWorld claim to represent solar manufacturing, even though together they employ fewer than 500 workers. There are more than 38,000 Americans, however, who work in the fast-growing U.S. solar manufacturing sector.
The companies and domestic suppliers which signed the letter to the ITC employ more than 5,700 workers across the United States.
There are more than 600 facilities in the United States that build supplies for the solar industry. These companies make steel and polysilicon, inverters and trackers, cells and panels and racking and mounting systems.
“If you overlap our jobs, with the processing plant and steel mill jobs related to our industry, and those jobs can circle out in the supply chain layers and layers, the jobs affected by our industry are even greater than the jobs we are counting at our respective companies,” said Russell Schmit, CEO of Schletter. “It’s hard to quantify exactly what this trade case could do, but I could see this cutting our business by half at least, so that would cost us 100 jobs or more.”
If the ITC sides with Suniva, homeowners and businesses who want to adopt solar will face higher prices, and demand for solar will drastically fall. This puts at risk thousands of American manufacturing jobs at factories in every region of the country where products are built. In total, 88,000 solar jobs would reportedly be lost under Suniva’s requested remedy.
"The vast majority of Americans want solar and its continued adoption is vital to drive economic success in the U.S.,” said Michael Maulick, CEO of SunLink. “There is tremendous opportunity for future growth with new technology innovations to create more intelligent solar energy. Companies that embrace innovation and deliver cutting-edge products will thrive, but ones that don’t invest in innovation -- like the two petitioners -- will fail. Tariffs proposed by the petitioners will not advance the U.S. economy and only stifle continued innovation in solar.”
PanelClaw together with Ecolibrium Solar, Advanced Solar Products, Aerocompact, Anchor Products, Array Technologies, EcoFasten Solar, DCE Solar, GameChange Solar, IronRidge, NexTracker, OMCO, Pegasus Solar, QuickMounts PV, RBI Solar, S-5!, Schletter, SMASHsolar, SnapNrack, Solar FlexRack, Sollega, SunFoldings, SunModo, SunLink, TerraSmart, TesSolar and Unirac, has filed this unified letter of opposition with the ITC.